Because sad eyes never lie

There was such deepness to her sad eyes, which I'll never forget. A hollowness with clarity, which I've never seen before. 

Wickedly funny

Rejected

Billy's Balloon

Butterfly

Nothing is better than high heels, bubble baths and wine!

Chaos

A good friend of mine is convinced I ask too many questions for my own good, but here I go anyway :):

1736484987334897548756987493759348758743587438754893
4398737573443534543597345987437543976593097240975097
498753828044354038608568430985234059048598485443585
9284875r08423890740712344894457524397520947509724507
3498750894534597437520710724507429752492610645642084
43985r85748435897247560247670247824-725-4754296724964


Take a look at these numbers. What are these numbers? Random numbers. Do they mean anything? No. Why? Because they're random. So would anyone study something meaningless and pointless? Most likely not.

If life is truly random like these numbers, then why are there scientists, anthropologists, anatomists, etc. who are studying prokaryotic cells, eukaryotic cells, tissues, organs, plants and animals? Why are there philosophers and run-of-the-mill people questioning the meaning of life or wondering what their purpose in life is? Why is there order rather than chaos? If life is all just a chaotic, random universe, then nobody would be studying it because there would be no reason to do so.

I've grappled with the possiblity of life being a extroadinary random accident this past summer.

Hence the two cosmological views I've looked at:

1) Cosmos had a beginning: There was nothing before the big bang. Everything came after the big bang; but Sarte asked an old aged philosophical question about nothinginess: "Why is there something rather than nothing?" In other words, how can something come from nothing?

2) Cosmos always has been, always existed: I learned about the Second Law of Thermodynamics in my biology and genetics course; this law states that energy is always being converted to less-useful energy. Everything around us is winding down--so eventually, energy will run out. If this is the case, then we have no future; everything will be dead...So how does this theory work with the "cosmos always existing"? The claim that the universe will be dead in the future debunks the eternity of the cosmos theory.

With all this in mind, I'm looking outside my window to watch all the critters run around in preparation for the fall and I'm wondering how could the notion that this was all just a freak accident even exist?

The art of design

"I remember well the time when the thought of the eye made me cold all over, but I have got over this stage of complaint, and now the small trifling particulars of structure often make me uncomfortable. The sight of a feather in a peacock's tail, whenever I gaze at it, it makes me sick!"

-Charles Darwin (Letter to Asa Gray, dated 3 April 1860, The Life and Letters of Charles Darwin)

Darwin's statement amazes me and piques my curiosity. Why did the sight of eyes in a peacock's feather make Darwin sick and cold all over? Because it looks like someone had literally and intentionally designed it with thought. Even Darwin, who came up with the most influential theory in modern history, cannot comprehend the intelligence of design in beauty.

Written before Darwin in 1802, William Paley's Natural Theology: or, Evidences of the Existence and Attributes of the Deity, Collected from the Appearance of Nature best illustrates how humans have the eye for design. We know design, we recognize design:

"But suppose I had found a watch upon the ground, and it should be inquired how the watch happened to be in that place, I should hardly think of the answer which I had before given,--that, for anything I knoew, the watch might have always been there. Yet why should not this answer serve for the watch as well as for the stone?...For this reason, and for no other, viz,. that, when we come to inspect the watch we perceive (what we could not discover in the stone) that its several parts are famed put together for a purpose....[Description of watch omitted.] This mechanism being observed... the inference, we think, is inevitalbe, that the watch must have had a maker....who comprehended its construction, and designed its use."

In short, Paley says we recognize when something has been made with intelligence such as a watch. When we see a watch, we believe without question and hesitation, that the watch must have had a watchmaker. 

...The design in the world and the design of our bodies must have had a Designer.

Yay for design!